Micah Richards launched a blistering attack on a Newcastle United player following the Magpies’ 4–1 defeat to Liverpool, tearing into the £50k-a-week Newcastle star after what he described as an error-strewn and anxious display away from home.

MICHA RICHARDS SLAMS NEWCASTLE STAR AFTER ANFIELD HUMILIATION
Micah Richards launched a blistering attack on a Newcastle United player following the Magpies’ 4–1 defeat to Liverpool, tearing into the £50k-a-week Newcastle star after what he described as an error-strewn and anxious display away from home.
Speaking during post-match analysis, Richards pulled no punches as he questioned the player’s confidence, composure, and suitability for a club aiming to compete at the top end of the Premier League.

️ “He’s behind all the silly goals — get rid of him,” Richards said.
️ “He wasn’t himself, it’s clear to everyone watching.”
️ “He’s always anxious when playing.”
In one of his most cutting remarks, the former Manchester City defender suggested the player is out of his depth at Newcastle, insisting he “should be playing for a Championship team” rather than starting for the Magpies.
Lead lost, heads dropped
Newcastle had taken an early lead and briefly looked capable of causing an upset, but Richards highlighted how quickly things unraveled once Liverpool increased the tempo.

️ “They couldn’t protect their lead,” he added, pointing to poor decision-making and fragile defending as Liverpool came from behind and completely took control of the match.
The Reds punished Newcastle’s mistakes ruthlessly, scoring four times as the Magpies’ confidence drained and defensive structure collapsed.
Calls for change grow louder
Richards urged Newcastle’s hierarchy to be ruthless, claiming repeated errors are costing the team at crucial moments.

️ “At this level, you can’t keep making the same mistakes and expect different results,” he said, urging the club to replace the player if they want to move forward.
The comments have ignited debate among Newcastle supporters, with some backing Richards’ no-nonsense verdict and others arguing the criticism was excessive.